SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(SC) 390

S. V. N. BHATTI, PRASANNA B. VARALE
VPS Healthcare Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Prabhat Kumar Srivastava – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Haris Beeran, Adv. Mr. Azhar Assees, Adv. Mr. Anand B. Menon, Adv. Mr. Prateek Singh Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Shreya Sethi, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhatia, Adv. Ms. Rizwana R. Raj, Adv. Mr. Shaswat Jena, Adv. Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Ms. Diya Kapur, Sr. Adv. Mr. Daya Krishan Sharma, AOR Mr. Rohit Vats, Adv. Mr. Naman Gupta, Adv. Mr. Rohit Yadav, Adv. Mr. Ankit Bhanot, Adv.

Judgement Key Points

What is the triggering moment for enforcement of an indemnity under a consent award: immediate when liability crystallizes or only after confirmation by the Highest Court of Appeal?

What is the proper interpretation of Paragraph 32(a) of the Consent Award, including the meaning of its four limbs and whether the fourth limb creates an absolute indemnity obligation or a contingent obligation?

What is the correct forum definition and its effect on the enforceability and timing of the indemnity obligations under the Consent Award?


Table of Content
1. overview of parties and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments regarding commencement of liability. (Para 10 , 14)
3. court's observations on the contractual interpretation. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 18 , 19)
4. ratio decidendi on immediate enforcement obligations. (Para 27)
5. final judgment allowing the enforcement petition. (Para 29 , 30)

JUDGMENT

S.V.N. BHATTI, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. VPS Healthcare Private Limited and Medeor Hospitals Limited are the Appellants. Prabhat Kumar Srivastava and Rishi Srivastava are the Respondents. A third-party M/S Ernst and Young LLP, Gurugram, is another entity to which a reference is made in the Judgment. For convenience, we refer to the Appellants, Respondents and the third party as VPS/Medeor, Promoters and EY, respectively.

3. The Civil Appeal arises from the Judgment dated 01.05.2023, in OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 184/2022 in the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi. The Impugned Judgment deferred the execution of the Consent Award dated 01.03.2019, which was made by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (hereinafter “SIAC”) in Arbitration No. 093/2017 between VPS/Medeor and the Promoters. The circumstances lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top