J. K. MAHESHWARI, ATUL S. CHANDURKAR
Kumud Lall – Appellant
Versus
Suresh Chandra Roy (Dead) Through LRs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
J.K. Maheshwari J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The present appeals arise out of the challenge preferred by the legal heirs1[Wife and son.] of the alleged medically negligent doctor (deceased now), to the order2[26.05.2010 (Impugned Order I) in M.A. No. 1214 of 2009 (Application for substitution) in Revision Petition No. 432 of 2006.] passed by the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, New Delhi (in short ‘NCDRC’), thereby allowing the application filed by the complainant (deceased now) seeking substitution of the legal heirs of the doctor, pending revision and directing them to be brought on record. On filing review, it was also dismissed3[vide order dated 24.05.2018 (Impugned Order II) passed in M.A. No. 324 of 2011 (Review) in Revision Petition No. 432 of 2006 and R.A. No. 70 of 2011 (Review) in Revision Petition No. 432 of 2006] observing that the legal heirs shall be liable to satisfy the decretal amount to the extent payable from the estate left behind, on conclusion of the proceedings. Hence, the instant appeals to assail the orders passed in main case and review.
BRIEF FACTS
3. The case as set up by the complainant before District Forum, Munger, Bihar (in short ‘Di
Melepurath Sankunni Ezhuthassan Vs. Thekittil Geopalankutty Nair, (1986) 1 SCC 118 [Para 11
M. Veerappa Vs. Evelyn Sequeira, (1988) 1 SCC 556 [Para 11
Balbir Singh Makol Vs. Chairman, M/s Gangaram Hospital and Others, 2001 (1) CPR 45 (NC) [Paras 11
Neeraj Amarnath Dora Vs. Nandan Hospital and Others
G. Jayaprakash Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Indian Evangelical Lutheran Church Trust Association vs. Sri Bala & Co.
Dahiben Vs. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) dead through legal representatives
(1) In case of death, legal representatives of deceased can pursue claim – Property, under the Act, will have a much wider connotation than conventional definition.(2) In assessing, what has been des....
The cause of action in a suit for injunction against a deceased party survives and is heritable, and the decree is executable against the legal representatives.
Medical negligence established due to lack of standard care leading to death; responsibility shared by insurer and practitioner.
To maintain a claim petition it is sufficient for the claimant to establish that there is loss of dependency and every legal representative who suffers on account of death of a person in a motor vehi....
The court held that claims for death due to wrongful acts are governed by the Fatal Accidents Act's limitation period, specifically Article 82 of the Limitation Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the legal representatives of a deceased passenger are entitled to continue the claim for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989, despite th....
Legal representatives under the Motor Vehicles Act can claim compensation even if not dependents, affirming broader interpretations of eligible claimants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.