SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(AP) 1107

RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Bandugula Kishan – Appellant
Versus
Managing director and Vice-Chairman – Respondent


( 1 ) W. P. No. 29326 of 1997 is filed, by two senior marketing officers of the A. P. State Agro industries Development Corporation, seeking a declaration that the proceeding dated 18. 10. 1997 of the 1st respondent is arbitrary, illegal, in violation of principles of natural justice and in violation of Articles 14, 15 (4), 16, 16 (4), 21, 39 and 41 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents to continue the petitioners as senior Officers or in any other equivalent category.

( 2 ) W. P. No. 29327 of 1997 is filed by the then marketing manager of A. P. State agro Industries Development Corporation questioning the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 29. 10. 1997 as arbitrary, illegal and in violation of his fundamental rights and the directive principles of State policy.

( 3 ) W. P. No. 30602 of 1997 is filed by two erstwhile senior marketing Officers of the A. P. State Agro Industries Development corporation questioning the proceedings of the 1st respondent, in Proc. No. AMII:jm:9533:93 dated 18. 10. 1997 as illegal and

( 4 ) W. P. No. 32265 of 1997 is filed by an erstwhile senior officer of the A. P. State agro Industries Development Corporation quest






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top