SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(AP) 30

R.RAMANUJAM, N.Y.HANUMANTHAPPA
K. Harinatha Reddy – Appellant
Versus
B. Rama Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) SINCE the Recall Petition and the Review Petition relate to the same subject-matter viz. , to recall and view the judgment passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 21859 of 1996, dated 1-3-2000, (reported in 2000 AIHC 2047), they are clubbed together and disposed of along with the above contempt case by this common order.

( 2 ) FOR purpose of convenience the parties are referred to as arrayed in the writ petition.

( 3 ) THE petitioners have filed the above writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to grant Ryotwari patta under S. 7 of the Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Inams (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "theact") in respect of the land in S. No. 246 of Vallerigunta patteda in Tiruchanur village, Tirupati Rural Mandal.

( 4 ) THE whole dispute revolves around S. No. 246 of Vallerigunta Patteda in Tiruchanur village. According to the writ petitioners, the lands in S. No. 246 are inam lands and their late father K. R. Krishna Reddy purchased the said lands from the inamdars, viz. , M. Singarachari etc. , under a registered sale deed dated 2-2-1970 and they being the legal heirs of late K. R. Krishna Reddy a

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top