G.BIKSHAPATHY, S.PARVATHA RAO
Land Acquisition Officer And dy. Director of Social Welfare, Nizambad – Appellant
Versus
G. Narayana Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal is preferred by the Referring Officer under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition act, 1894 ( the Act for short) against the judgment and decree dated 26-5-1986 of die learned Additional District Judge, Nizamabad in O. P. No. 225 of 1984 questioning the enhancement of the compensation from Rs. 30,000/- per acre awarded by the Land acquisition Officer (the appellant herein) under Award dated 15-6-1984 to rs. 1,48,426-70 ps per acre on a reference under Section 18 of the Act in respect of land of an extent of Ac. /-25 guntas in S. Nos. 3287 to 3294 of Nizamabad belonging to the respondent herein who was the claimant in the said O. P.
( 2 ) THE respondent-claimant has preferred cross-objections claiming compensation at the rate of Rs. 63/- per Sq. yard for the land acquired and contending that the learned Additional District Judge erred in fixing the rate per Sq. yard at Rs. 46/ and in also deducting 1/3 rd area of the land towards developmental purposes like roads, drainages, parks etc.
( 3 ) NOTIFICATION under Section 4 (1) of the Act in respect of the land in question was published in District Gazette No. 93, dated 22-9-1976. The land was acquire
Narayana Gajapatiraju v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatnam
Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Visakhapatnam Vs P.Narasing Rao
P.Ram Reddy Vs Land Acquisition Officer, Hyderabad Urban Development
GULZARA SINGH Vs State of Punjab
LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,ELURU Vs JASTI ROHINI
P.RAM REDDY Vs LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER,HYDERABAD URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,HYDERABAD
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.