2011 (2) ALT 130
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.V.S RAO & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN
Divisional Forest Officer, Eluru
Versus
District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru & Others
Review W.A. M.P. No. 2601 of 2009 & W.A. No.82 of 1998
Decided On: 08-09-2010
process of enquiry into the claim of land meant for forest block, colluding with the claimants, not give proper notice to the Divisional Forest Officer for cross-examining the claimants and the various sales deeds were not even produced, the order of the Forest officer is non-est and set aside by the high Court. The claimant was not even borne by the time alleged grant of Zamindari patta and neither the claimant nor his father shown it in their declarations under Land Reform Act.
B) FOREST (CONSERVATION) ACT, 1980, Section 2:- Those who obtained the demarcation of patta land by playing a fraud on the Forest Settlement Officer and obtained a writ order on the basis of it, the plea of reaching finality in litigation cannot be raised to oppose the review of the said order. This doctrine of finality cannot be an instrument of fraud and those played fraud by suppression of material facts cannot have advantage of such fraud. The order set aside in revision. (Para 21)
(Per Ramesh Ranganathan, Judge)
1. This Petition is filed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Eluru seeking review of the order in W.A. No.82 of 1998 dated 25-1-2002.
2. An extent of 4900 acres in Bhogole Forest Block, in Chintalapudi Taluq, Eluru Division of West Godavari District, was handed over to the Forest Department on 1-12-1952, and a notification was proposed to be issued under Section 26 of the Forest Act V of 1882 (Andhra Area). After excluding certain portions thereof for communal purposes, the remaining extent of 4100 acres was demarcated and a notification, under Section 4 of the A.P. Forest Act, 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), was issued vide G.O.Ms.No.3, Food and Agriculture Development (Forest-III), dated 3-1-1970. The said notification was published in the West Godavari District Gazette on 7-8-1976. A proclamation, under Section 6 of the Act, was published in the West Godavari Gazette on 6-5-1997. All persons claiming right in the said land, or to any of the forest produce therefrom, were called upon to state, within six months from the date of proclamation, the nature of their rights, and to produce all documents in support thereof.
3. After a joint claim statement was filed, Sri Inuganti Ramakrishna Ranga Rao, in his sworn statement dated 21-6-1982, deposed that the patta lands in Sy.No.537/1 to 5 was once shortriyam land belonging to Bhogole village; his grand-father Sri Inunganti Madhava Rao was the then Zamindar of Bhogole Zamin; on 2-2-1931 zamindari pattas were granted over an extent of Ac.112.68 cts in Sy.No.537/2 in favour of Smt. Inuganti Rajyalakshmamma; an extent of Ac.94.00 cts in Sy.No.537/3 in his favour on 16-12-1931; and an extent of Ac.135.82 cts. in Sy.No.537/4 in favour of Sri Inuganti Papa Rao on 22-1-1931. He further deposed that these lands were not under cultivation during their regime, and were left out as grazing poramboke; and the said lands were sold to several individuals, by way of registered documents, for the extents noted against each. A list of 28 such individuals was furnished. The Forest Settlement Officer addressed a letter to the Tehsildar, Chintalapudi requesting him to furnish the names and addresses of the present owners of the land. The Tehsildar is said to have furnished a list of the names of land owners in R.S.No.537/2, 3 and4 of Bhogolu village of Chintalapudi Taluq. The said persons, 28 in number, are said to have submitted petitions requesting the Forest Settlement Officer to settle the claim already preferred by the original pattedars Sri Inuganti Rama Krishna Ranga Rao and others from whom they claimed to have purchased the land.
4. In this letter dated 18-12-1984, addressed to the Secretary to the Government, the Forest Settlement Officer states that he had requested the Divisional Forest Officer, Eluru, vide letter dated 10-8-1981 duly enclosing the claim petitions in Bhogolu Forest Block, to file his counter, if any, on the claim of the parties over the land; no counter was filed by the Divisional Forest Officer, Eluru; subsequently notices were issued to the 28 individuals to attend the enquiry with all documentary evidence to prove their right over the land; 24 claimants had attended the enquiry on 18-10-1984, 20-10-1984 and 21-10-1984 at Eluru; they filed documents in support of their claim on 20-10-1984; on further notice, the remaining four claimants had attended the enquiry on 7-11-1984; during the enquiry all the claimants had given similar individual statements; they deposed that they had purchased the land from Smt. Inuganti Rajyalakshmamma, Sri Inuganti Rama Krishna Ranga Rao and Sri Inuganti Papa Rao all of whom held zamindari pattas they were paying cist for the lands purchased by them; sub-division was effected by the revenue department; different extents of land were handed over to the concerned individuals; patta pass book was given to them by the revenue department; the Forest Department Officials had prevented them fro
S.P. Chengalvaraya Naidu v. Jaganath: (1994) 1 SCC 1. (Para 10)
Shrisht Dhawan v. Shaw Bros: (1992) 1 SCC 534. (Para 10)
Roshan Deen v. Preeti Lal: (2002) 1 SCC 100 2002 (5) AU 9.2 (DN SC). (Para 10)
Ashok Leyland Ltd. v. State of T.N.: (2004) 3 SCC 1. (Para 10)
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rajendra Singh: (2000) 3 SCC 581. (Para 11)
Indian Bank v. Sat yam Fibres (India) (P) Ltd.: (1996) 5 SCC 550. (Para 13)
Gowrishankar v. Joshi Amba Shankar Family Trust: (1996) 3 SCC 310. (Para 19)
Ramchandra Singh v. Savithri Devi: (2003) 8 SCC 319. (Para 10)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.