SANJAY KUMAR, J.UMA DEVI
Challapalli Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
Meka Gangadhara Rao – Respondent
Sanjay Kumar, J.
1. This first appeal under Section 96 CPC arises out of the judgment and decree dated 14.03.2008 of the learned Principal District Judge, West Godavari District at Eluru, in O.S.No.16 of 2007. The appellants are the defendants in the said suit which was filed for specific performance of the agreement of sale dated 26.07.2006 (Ex.A1); for execution of a registered sale deed in respect of the suit property upon receiving the balance sale consideration; and for delivery of possession. By the judgment under appeal, the trial Court decreed the suit directing the plaintiff to deposit the balance sale consideration to the credit of the suit with interest thereon at 12% per annum; permitting the defendants to receive the said amount and directing them to execute a registered sale deed in favour of the plaintiff at his expense within two months from the date of deposit; and also to deliver possession of the suit schedule property, failing which the plaintiff was granted liberty to get the regular sale deed through process of law; and if the plaintiff failed to deposit the balance sale consideration within the stipulated time, directing the defendants to refund the
C.MANOHAR REDDY Vs. ALOPI SHANKER
C.PADMAWATI NAIDU Vs. FRIENDS CO-OPERATIVE HSG. SOCIETY LTD.
I.S. SIKANDAR Vs. K. SUBRAMANI
J.P. BUILDERS Vs. A. RAMADAS RAO
K. PRAKASH Vs. B.R. SAMPATH KUMAR
KROVIDI KAMESWARAMMA Vs. KUDAPA BALARAMAYYA
LOURDU MARI DAVID Vs. LOUIS CHINNAYA AROGIASWAMY
MOHAMMED IBRAHIM Vs. MOHAMMED ABDUL RAZZAK
SARADAMANI KANDAPPAN Vs. S. RAJALAKSHMI
TATAVARTHI JAGANNADHAM (DIED) PER L.R. Vs. AKKINENI RADHAKRISHNA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.