ORDER :

M. Seetharama Murti, J.

1. These civil revision petitions arise out of five orders separately made, on 28.3.2018, by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Guntur in IA Nos. 237, 240, 241, 239 and 238 of 2018 in OS No. 118 of 2012 filed by the plaintiffs for amendment of pleadings. By the said orders, all the said petitions are allowed. In view of the commonality and identity of subject-matter of all the interlocutory applications, which are allowed, these CRPs are being disposed of by this common order.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri S.S. Prasad, learned Senior Counsel, representing Ms. C. Sindhu Kumari, learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner-unsuccessful 1st respondent-1st defendant ['1st defendant', for brevity] and of Smt. V. Dyumani, learned Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 & 2-plaintiffs ['plaintiffs', for brevity]. I have perused the material record.

3. To begin with, it is to be noted that the plaintiffs instituted the suit against the 1st defendant and three others for eviction from the plaint schedule premises and recovery of vacant possession of the same, recovery of money towards use & occupation and other reliefs. The 1st defendant