Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI
P. Ranga Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Sri P. Ranga Rao, the petitioner, is present in person. He is represented through his counsel, Sri Srinivas Ambati.
2. Heard Sri Srinivas Ambati, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration for the respondent No.1, Sri S. Lakshminarayana Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 and Sri V. Surya Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.4 and 5.
3. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a petitioner cannot initiate parallel proceedings on the same subject matter by filing a writ petition while already having initiated an appea....
Suppression of material facts and failure to join necessary parties render a writ petition untenable; fraud on the court mandates dismissal of the case.
Parties must approach the court with clean hands; suppression of material facts leads to dismissal of petitions.
The pendency of proceedings before the Municipal Corporation does not automatically bar the exercise of jurisdiction by the Authority under RERA. The Authority has the power to determine whether the ....
Courts Act is very wide and squarely covers all the aforesaid acts committed by Accused Nos.2 and 3. In view of the above, Accused Nos.2 and 3 have committed criminal contempt as contemplated under t....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
