SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 623

B. KRISHNA MOHAN
K. China Audi Narayana – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: D.V. Sasidhar.

ORDER :

1. Heard the counsel for the petitioner, the government pleader for endowments, the standing counsel for the respondent No.4 and the counsel appearing for the unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 13.

2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.1 in issuing the G.O.Rt.No.8, dated 06.01.2022 constituting the non hereditary trust board for the respondent No.4-temple.

3. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner hails from the family of founder trustees of the respondent No.4-temple. He filed an application under Section 87(1)(h) of the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act (Act 30 of 1987) in O.A.No.70 of 2008 before the Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Guntur seeking declaration that the petitioner belongs to the founder family of the subject temple and the same was allowed vide orders dated 30.08.2008.

4. Challenging the same one Mr.Palaparthi Narayana Rao filed A.S.No.944 of 2008 before the Hon’ble High Court and stay of operation of the orders in O.A.No.70 of 2008 dated 30.08.2008 was granted in A.S.M.P.No.2798 of 2008 in A.S.No.944 of 2008 which was subsequently renumbered as CMA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top