SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 684

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
Dhulipalla Venkateswara Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 28701 of 2021
Decided on : 21-10-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI

The construction of a Grama Sachivalayam building under MGNREGS works requires the approval of the Gramasabha and can only be commenced by the Grampanchayat, in compliance with the provisions of the MGNREG Act, 2005 and the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994.

Headnote:

MGNREGS - CONSTRUCTION OF GRAMA SACHIVALAYAM - APPROVAL OF GRAMASABHA - AUTHORITY - GRAMPANCHAYAT - RESOLUTION - SPECIAL OFFICER - VALIDITY - MGNREG ACT, 2005 - SECTION 16 - A.P. PANCHAYAT RAJ ACT, 1994 - SECTION 6.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioner, an elected Sarpanch of a Grampanchayat, challenged the construction of a Grama Sachivalayam building under MGNREGS works in the Grampanchayat premises, alleging that it was done contrary to a resolution passed by the Grampanchayat and without conducting a Gramasabha as required by law.

Finding of the Court:

The Court found that the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam was commenced without conducting a Gramasabha for approval and commencement of the work under MGNREG scheme, as required under Section 6 of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 and Section 16 of the MGNREG Act, 2005. The Court also found that the Grampanchayat, headed by a Special Officer, had passed a resolution for the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam and other works pursuant to an administrative sanction, but this was contrary to the provisions of the MGNREG Act and the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act.

Issues: 1. Whether the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam was valid without the approval of the Gramasabha? 2. Whether the Grampanchayat, headed by a Special Officer, could pass a resolution for the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam and other works pursuant to an administrative sanction?

Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam was invalid as it was done without the approval of the Gramasabha, which is the authority for sanction and identification of developmental works to be carried out under the MGNREG scheme. The Court also held that the Grampanchayat, headed by a Special Officer, could not pass a resolution for the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam and other works pursuant to an administrative sanction, as this was contrary to the provisions of the MGNREG Act and the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act.

Final Decision: The Court directed the respondent authorities to conduct a Gramasabha as per Section 6 of the A.P. Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 in compliance of Section 16 of the MGNREG Act, 2005, and after approval of the works under the MGNREG scheme, the construction of the Grama Sachivalayam building shall be commenced by the Grampanchayat only. Till then, no construction of Grama Sachivalayam as well as other works under MGNREG scheme shall be commenced.

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in constructing the Grama Sachivalayam building under MGNREGS works in the premises of Venkata Krishnapuram Gram Panchayat, Pedakakani Mandal, Guntur District, contrary to the resolution of the Gram Panchayat, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Heard Sri Korrapati Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.7,10 and 11, and learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj appearing for respondent Nos.1, 2, 5, 6, 8, 9 and 12.

3. In brief, the case of the petitioner is that he was elected as Sarpanch of the 11th respondent-Grampanchayat in the month of March, 2021. Since the petitioner is the supporter of the opposition party, the local leaders of the party in power are not allowing him to discharge his functions as Sarpanch of the Grampanchayat. Before the general elections for local bodies for some period there is no elected body, but the Grampanchayat was administered by a Government nominee/Special Officer as an elected body. At the helm of his affairs, a resolution was passed on 11.10.2019 for construction of Grama Sachivalayam. Pursuant to the said resolution, the 3rd respondent accorded administrative sanction vide his proceedings dated 12.11.2019. However, the construction of Grama Sachivalayam was not commenced before the election of the petitioner as Sarpanch. On 24.09.2021 the 8th respondent issued a notice to the petitioner requesting him to commence the developmental works i.e., Village Secretariat building, Rytu Bharosa Center, YSR Health Center, Bulk Milk Collection Center and YSR Digital Library, which were granted in favour of the Grampanchayat under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (for short “MGNREG Scheme”). Pursuant to the said letter, the petitioner commenced the works in accordance with the administrative sanction. But, the local leaders of the party in power at the behest of local M.L.A. did not allow the petitioner to commence the works. Then, the Grampanchayat passed a resolution dated 12.10.2021 for construction of a community hall at the subject site and the same was intimated to the 6th respondent for taking steps. While matters stood thus, some unknown persons started construction of a building in the Grampanchayat premises without there being any permission and authority. Then, the petitioner submitted a complaint to the S.H.O., Pedakakani P.S. on 28.10.2021 and also a representation to all the official respondents on 11.11.2021 requesting to take appropriate action against the unauthorised persons who are carrying on the unauthorised construction at the Grampanchayat premises. Even after receipt of the representation of the petitioner, the official respondents did not stop the illegal construction. Having no other option, the petitioner preferred the present writ petition.

4. A counter affidavit is filed on behalf of respondent Nos.7, 10 and 11 wherein it is stated that the construction of Grama Sachivalayam has already been commenced in the month of October, 2021 and the construction reached the foundation level. At this stage, the work was stalled due to the complaint made by the petitioner. The construction of Grama Sachivalayam is in accordance with the MGNREG scheme as well as in pursuance of the resolutions dated 11.10.2019 and 20.11.2019 passed by the Grampanchayat and also as per the proceedings issued by the 8th respondent dated 09.01.2020 for commencement of the works. The 11th respondent has been executing the work. As such, the writ petition is devoid of merits and hence, the same is liable to be dismissed.

5. The 12th respondent filed a counter affidavit stating that the Grampanchayat passed a resolution dated 11.10.2019 for construction of Grama Sachivalayam building with the MGNREGS funds of Rs.35.00 lakhs within the jurisdiction of the 11th respondent-Grampanchayat premises. It is also stated that pursuant to the administrative sanction of the 3rd

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top