JUDGMENT:

1. Heard Sri G. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.

None appeared for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:

“this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ or direction or any other appropriate order, more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the impugned orders of the 3rd respondent- Divisional Order No.119 of 2010 Lr.No.G/XP.227/153/11/GRP/2009 dated 10.12.2010 imposing a penalty of removal the orders of the 2nd respondent No.65/2011 dated 03.06.2011 rejecting the appeal of the petitioner as bad in law, arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the rules on the subject matter and shockingly disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct and consequently set aside the same with a direction to the respondents to reconsider the case of the petitioner for imposing a lower penalty such as compulsory retirement in the interest of justice.”

3. Sri G. Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner joined as constable in Railway Protection Force (for short, “R.P.F”) on probation on 14.12.1995 at B. Company, Secunderabad Division af