V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
A. Sri Venkata Suryanarayana Raju – Appellant
Versus
R. Naga Venkata Vijayalakshmi – Respondent
ORDER :
The defendant in money suits made an effort to have all the three suits consolidated and tried together, but the learned trial Court declined his prayers and that resulted in filing of the present revision petitions whereunder the revision petitioner in each of these three revisions seek to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and request to rectify the orders of the Court below. In all the three revisions, the revision petitioner is common and the respondent in each of these revision petitions is different. However, the facts and law that have come up for consideration are common in all the three revisions and therefore, all the three revisions are disposed of by this common order.
2. O.S.No.38 of 2017 is a suit for recovery of money based on the foot of a promissory note of Rs.7,50,000/-filed against Sri Alluri Sri Venkata Suryanarayana Raju. O.S.No.39 of 2017 is a suit for recovery of money based on the foot of a promissory note of Rs.12,00,000/-filed against Sri Alluri Sri Venkata Suryanarayana Raju. O.S.No.40 of 2017 is a suit for recovery of money based on the foot of a promissory note of Rs.10,00,000/-filed against Sri Al
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.