BATTU DEVANAND
In Rep – Appellant
Versus
A. Giridhar – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Contempt Case is initiated against the respondents for their willful disobedience in complying the order of this Court dated 30.11.2020 and for obstructing the Constitutional functions of the Court.
2. In C.C. No. 1309 of 2020, at the stage of admission, on 30.11.2020 this Court ordered notices to the respondents therein and directed to post the contempt case on 14.12.2020. But, the C.C. No. 1309 of 2020 is posted on 18.12.2020. On verification of the case record, it was found that, the notices were dispatched by the Registry only on 17.12.2020 and contempt case was listed on 18.12.2020. Considering the same, this Court is of the prima-facie opinion that the Registry did not comply the orders of this Court in true spirit and they are obstructing the Constitutional functions of this Court and accordingly, directed the Registrar General to initiate contempt proceedings against the officers of the Registry who are responsible for not implementing the orders dated 30.11.2020 of this Court and submit “Action Taken Report” on the next date of hearing i.e. on 18.01.2021.
3. The Registrar General placed “Action Taken Report” before this Court on 18.01.2021 wherein, it is state
Attorney General vs. Times Newspapers
Anil Ratan Sarkar and Others vs. Hirak Ghosh and Others
Kapildeo Prasad Sah and Others vs. State of Bihar and Others
Maninderjit Singh Bitta vs. Union of India
Patel Rajnikant Dhulabhai and Others vs. Patel Chandrakant Dhulabhai and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.