IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, B. SYAMSUNDER, JJ.
K. Naga Venkata Veera Raju @ Naga Raju, S/o. Nancharaiah - Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana and A.P. Hyderabad - Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 1205 of 2016
Decided On : 22-02-2023
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(ii)(v) -Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Sections 357, 164,209 and 207 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 376(f), 3(i)(x), 149 I.P., 305 and 148 - SCs & STs (POA) Act, 1989 - Section 3(i)(x)(xii) - Appeal against conviction - Commits rape - P.Ws.2 and 3 are the parents of the victim, who was examined as P.W.1. It is said that P.W.1 who was studying 3rd class by staying in the Government Hostel - Accused came to her and asked her to collect Tamarind and accordingly took her to trees which were behind her - accused asked her to sit on his lap and again committed rape on her, at which point of time blood oozed out from her private parts - Held, Cross-examination of P.W.2 it is very clear that one leader from KVPS came to Police Station, and the said leader drafted the report to his dictation, he was also informed that he would get on lodging a report and that he made an application for job and land - Really an incident of this nature has occurred, coolies working in the neighbouring lands would have definitely joined and raised protest against accused apart from helping him in lodging the report. P.W.2 who is an I.T.I. Graduate - Criminal Appeal is allowed
JUDGMENT :
C. Praveen Kumar, J.
1. The sole accused in Special Sessions Case No.31 of 2014 on the file of learned Special Sessions Judge-cum-X-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna at Machilipatnam, is the appellant herein. He was tried for an offence punishable under Section 3(ii)(v) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 [for short, “the Act”] and sentenced to suffer Imprisonment for Life and to pay a fine of Rs.5000/- [Rupees five thousand only] in default, to suffer Simple Imprisonment for Six Months for the offence punishable under Section 3(ii)(v) of the Act. He was also held liable to pay compensation of Rs.20,000/- [Rupees twenty thousand only] under Section 357 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 [for short, “Cr.P.C.”] to the prosecutrix.
2. The facts, in issue, are as under:-
(b) P.W.2, who informed about the incident to the President of their village, was asked to lodge a report. Thereafter, P.W.2 is said to have gone to the Police Station by boarding a bus and lodged a report before P.W.14-Sub Inspector of Police. Basing on which, P.W.14 registered a case in Crime No.45 of 2007 for the offence punishable under Section 376(f) of Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short, “I.P.C.”] and Section 3(i)(x) of the Act. Ex.P14 is the First Information Report [F.I.R.]. The said F.I.R. is registered at 11.45 A.M. which reached the Court at 10.00 P.M. though the distance between Court and Police Station is less than 1 K.M.
(c) P.W.16-Sub Divisional Police Officer, who took up investigation, reached the Police Station, collected the copy of F.I.R. and shifted the injured in 108 Ambulance to Government Hospital. He also informed to Superintendent of Police about the facts. He then visited the Government Hospital, examined P.Ws.1 to 3 and recorded their statements. Thereafter, he visited the scene of offence which is situated at the outskirts of Munjuluru fields of Pamarthivari Compound, prepared a rough sketch of the scene and also Ex.P5 observation report in the presence of P.W.7. At the scene, he claims to have recorded the statements of P.Ws.4 to 10. After recording the statements, he altered the section of law to one under Section 3(i)(xii) of the Act. Ex.P18 is the altered memo.
(d) It is also to be noted here that P.W.1 was sent to P.W.13-Civil Assistant Surgeon on 24.04.2007 itself, who examined her and gave Ex.P12 report. According to the doctor, the injuries have been caused by violent attempt to sexual offence.
(e) P.W.16-SDPO, who continued with the investigation arrested the accused on 26.04.2007 and pursuant to arrest made, he seized M.Os.1 to 3 i.e. Lungi, Shirt and Towel. He also produced the accused before P.W.15-Civil Assistant Surgeon, who certified that accused is capable of
Dinesh Alias Buddha vs. State of Rajasthan
Annareddy Sambasiva Reddy vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
The judgment establishes the guilt of the accused based on the evidence of attempted rape and assault, highlighting the importance of proving the accused's actions and intentions in criminal cases.
The court emphasized the need to carefully consider the entire testimony of a victim, especially in cases where the victim may have limited understanding or education. The judgment also clarified the....
The court emphasized that prosecution must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and inconsistencies in testimonies and lack of medical evidence prohibited sustaining the conviction.
The prosecution must establish that an offence under the SC/ST (POA) Act was committed specifically because the victim belongs to a Scheduled Caste, and the accused must have actual control over a ju....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement of direct evidence to prove the awareness of the victim's caste for conviction under section 3(2) (v) of the Scheduled Caste/Schedu....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for sufficient evidence to prove the commission of offenses under Section 3 (2) (v) of SC/ST Act and Section 376 of IPC, highlig....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.