V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Muddireddy Sivarami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. In this Criminal Revision Petition filed by three (3) convicts, they seek to set aside the judgment of the learned first appellate Court by exercising powers under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. Respondent herein is the State on whose prosecution these revision petitioners were earlier convicted by the learned trial Court.
2. The facts leading to the presentation of present revision are to be noticed.
Crime No. 50 of 2009 of Chennur police station was investigated into by the Sub Inspector of Police and on collection of evidence and conclusion of investigation a charge sheet was filed before learned First Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kadapa for the offences under Sections 324 r/w. 34 IPC and Section 188 IPC. After taking cognizance of offence and securing the presence of accused and having furnished copies of documents and after hearing counsel on both sides the learned trial Court framed a charge under Section 324 IPC as against A2 and A3 and a charge under Section 324 r/w. 34 IPC against A1. The accused denied the facts and pleaded not guilty. Further trial ensued where prosecution examined PWs. 1 to 8 and got marked Exs.P1 to P6 and also exhibited one of t
Mohd. Hussain @ Julfikar Ali vs. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The requirement of radiologist examination and production of x-ray files to prove the nature of injuries is essential in cases involving the determination of the nature of injuries under the Indian P....
Non-recovery of the weapon used in an offense is not fatal to the prosecution's case when reliable ocular eyewitness testimony is corroborated by medical evidence of the injuries sustained.
Inconsistencies in the evidence and failure to properly appreciate the material on record can lead to a manifest error of law, resulting in the acquittal of the accused.
The power of the Appellate Court to set aside the conviction and sentence passed by the trial Court and remand the case for framing of required charge and to conclude the case as per law, based on th....
Revisional jurisdiction should be exercised cautiously, limiting interference to exceptional cases only where manifest injustice or procedural errors exist, emphasizing the importance of the trial co....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.