Back
RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Bhimavarapu Giridhar Kumar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that he is one of the possessors of land to an extent of Ac.6-15 cents in R.S.No.40 of Konthanapadu village, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna District, adjoining NH-9/ NH-65 i.e. road leading from Vijayawada to Machilipatnam. The respondent autho
The main legal point established in the judgment is that land acquisition proceedings can be challenged after the passing of the award in exceptional cases, and the acquisition must be for a public p....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that land acquisition proceedings can be challenged after the passing of the award and receipt of compensation in exceptional cases falling within ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of complying with the specified time frame for filing objections under the National Highways Act and the court's emphasis on the pub....
The court affirmed the validity of land acquisition proceedings under the National Highways Act, emphasizing the expertise of the highway authority and limited scope for judicial review in technical ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
