SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 106

TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
Thummaluru Vanajakshamma, (died) – Appellant
Versus
Thummaluru Venkata Siva Reddy – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: K Venugopal Reddy
For the Respondent: G Ramesh Babu

JUDGMENT :

The appellants and respondents herein who are plaintiffs and defendants in the suit respectively, hereinafter referred to as Plaintiffs and defendants respectively. The plaintiffs filed the suit to declare the gift deed executed by the 1st defendant in favour of the 2nd defendant is not binding on the plaintiff and for consequential relief of permanent injunction. The suit OS No.129 of 2012 was dismissed by an order dated 18.11.2017 by the Junior Civil Judge, Rajampet.

2. Aggrieved by the said judgment and decree in O.S. No.129 of 2012 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Rajampet, the Plaintiff filed an appeal vide A.S. No.4 of 2018 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Rajampet. The Lower Appellate Court Judge by an order dated 06.07.2022 has set aside the judgment and decree in the suit and remanded back to the trial court.

3. Against the said remand order, the plaintiff has filed the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal. It is the contention of the plaintiff that the 1st appellate court failed to see the evidence on record which is sufficient to decide the matter by framing issue and remanding the matter to lead additional evidence and additional written sta

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top