SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 955

RAVI NATH TILHARI
P. Shobha Rani – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
T.Vijay Hanuman Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Heard Sri T. Vijay Hanuman Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri M. Srinivas Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and perused the material on record.

2. The petitioner's husband Late Sri P. Vijayabhaskara Reddy, having died during the service period, the petitioner was appointed as Typist under the scheme of Compassionate Appointment vide the proceedings of the Collector, Anantapur in Rc.No.A3/1396/2008 dtd. 18/8/2010. The petitioner had passed intermediate and was having Lower Grade in Typewriting-Telugu at the time of her appointment. The appointment was with a condition to complete Typewriting Higher grade in Telugu within two (02) years from the date of appointment order. The petitioner joined on 26/8/2010 and continued as typist, however she could not complete the Typewriting Higher Grade in Telugu within the specified period of two (02) years.

3. The petitioner was served with a Show Cause Notice, vide Rc.No.A2/5939/2016 dtd. 26/11/2016, to offer the explanation as to why she should not be reverted to the lower rank i.e., the post of attender/office subordinate for not acquiring the requisite qualification (i.e., Telugu Type

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top