ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT AT AMARAVATI
Cheekati Manavendranath Roy, J.
Smt. H. Malleswaramma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr. – Respondents
Criminal Petition No. 530 of 2022
Decided On : 09-02-2022
Quash - Criminal Petition - Court refuses to quash FIR based on allegations of false implication and counter blast
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners sought to quash the FIR filed against them for offenses including assault and outraging modesty, claiming false implication and counter blast.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the allegations in the FIR constituted offenses and required investigation to ascertain the truth, dismissing the petition to quash the FIR.
Issues: Allegations of false implication and counter blast, validity of quashing the FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the allegations in the FIR warranted investigation to determine their veracity, and the grounds presented did not warrant interference to quash the FIR at that stage.
Final Decision: The Criminal Petition was dismissed, and any pending miscellaneous petitions in the Criminal Petition were closed.
ORDER
1. This Criminal Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short "Cr.P.C.") is filed seeking quash of F.I.R in Crime No.330 of 2021 of Devanakonda Police Station, Kurnool District.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
3. The petitioners are A-1, A-3 and A-4 in Crime No.330 of 2021 of Devanakonda Police Station, Kurnool District. On a report lodged by the 2nd respondent, who is the de facto complainant, that the petitioners have attacked him and beat him and also outraged the modesty of his wife, a case in the above crime for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 506 r/w 34 IPC was registered against the petitioners. The said case is now under investigation.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have lodged a report with police against the 2nd respondent and as the same was not registered as an F.I.R that they approached the Superintendent of Police and on his directions, the F.I.R was registered against the de facto complainant and that thereafter the de facto complainant lodged the present report with a delay of 30 days and as such the allegations ascribed against the petitioners are all false and that the petitioners are falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioners sought for quash of the F.I.R on the aforesaid ground.
5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the Criminal Petition. He would submit that there are clear allegations in the F.I.R regarding the way in which the petitioners have beat the de facto complainant and outraged the modesty of his wife and as such the matter requires investigation to find out the truth or otherwise of the said allegations. So, he would pray for dismissal of the Criminal Petition.
6. As can be seen from the contents of the F.I.R, there are clear allegations that the petitioners have beat the de facto complainant and also his wife and a clear allegation of outraging the modesty of wife of the de facto complainant was also made. These allegations prima facie constitute offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 506 r/w 34 IPC for which the F.I.R was registered. Therefore, the matter requires investigation to find out the truth or otherwise of the said allegations. The mere fact that after the case was registered against the petitioners on the report lodged by the de facto complainant that the present report was lodged against them as a counter blast by itself cannot be a ground to quash the F.I.R. Whether the allegations are false or not and whether the report was lodged as a counter blast to the report lodged by the de facto complainant or not is the matter to be ascertained by the Investigating Officer during the course of investigation. Therefore, there are no valid legal grounds emanating from the record warranting interference of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash the F.I.R at this stage.
7. Resultantly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
8. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Petition, shall stand closed.
Allegations in the FIR warrant investigation to determine their truth, and grounds for quashing the FIR must be valid under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The Court has the authority to direct the completion of investigation and filing of a final report by the police in pending cases.
The court cannot interfere to quash the F.I.R or interdict the investigation under Section 482 Cr.P.C when the F.I.R prima facie discloses commission of cognizable offences and requires investigation....
Delay in filing FIR is not fatal to the prosecution case, and the truth of allegations is to be ascertained in the final adjudication of the case.
The court quashed the F.I.R under Section 303(2) BNS 2023 based on a compromise between the parties.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that a second complaint relating to the same incident is not prohibited under the Code, and if it presents a different version with additional alle....
The court cannot assess the truthfulness of allegations in an FIR at the quashing stage; it must determine if the FIR discloses a prima facie case for proceeding.
The right of the Investigating Agency to conduct investigations requires reasonable time unless no cognizable offence is disclosed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.