SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 979

BATTU DEVANAND
B. Ashok Naidu – Appellant
Versus
M. Hari Narayanan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P Jagadish Chandra Prasad, Advocate, Kiran Kumar Vadlamudi, Advocate, V Vinod K Reddy, Advocate, P Subash, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Battu Devanand, J. - This Contempt Case has been filed seeking to punish the respondents for willful disobedience in implementing the orders, dated 23.07.2021, passed by this Court in I.a.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.20463 of 2020.

2. This Court by order, dated 23.07.2021 in I.a.No.1 of 2020 in W.P.No.20463 of 2020, directed the Respondent authorities not to establish and construct permanent Panchayat Secretariat and Rythu Barosa Kendram building at B.N. Palle by considering the representation, dated 20.12.2020.

3. The present contempt case is filed complaining that the Respondents proceeding with construction by violating the order of this Court.

4. The Respondents filed their counter-affidavits.

5. In the counter-affidavit filed by the 5th Respondent, it is stated that they received orders of this Court on 31.07.2021 and immediately on the same day he stopped the execution of work and intimated the same to the Executive Engineer and assistant Engineer vide letter, dated 31.07.2021. The same was communicated to the Mandal Praja Parishad Development Officer also and accordingly, construction work has been stopped.

6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top