SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(AP) 1315

B. S. BHANUMATHI
Jampala Malayadri Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Meruva Subrahmanyam – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order, dtd. 12/3/2019, passed in C.F.No.1347 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Principal District Judge, Nellore.

2. Heard Sri T.Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/plaintiff and Sri T.C.D.Sekhar, learned counsel for the respondents/defendants. The 5th respondent is shown to be not a necessary party to this revision.

3. The suit was originally filed in the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Naidupet, and written statement was filed. As per the finding in I.A.No.352 of 2016 on court fee in preliminary enquiry, the suit falls within the pecuniary jurisdiction of Court of Senior Civil Judge at Guduru. The plaint, after return from the Junior Civil Judge's court, Naidupet, was presented in the court of Senior Civil Judge, Gudur, and it was returned with some objections. Subsequently, the original plaint was misplaced in the office of the advocate.

4. A petition was filed seeking permission to re-construct the plaint based on the duplicate copy of plaint and other records filed earlier at the time of filing of the suit in the Court of Junior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top