Back
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Nissanakara Venu – Appellant
Versus
Kota Masthan Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT:
The appellant is claim petitioner and the respondents are respondents in M.V.O.P.No.702 of 2007 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge, Nellore. The appellant filed the appeal questioning the legal validity of the order of the Tribunal.
2. For the sake of convenience, both the parties in the appeal will be referred to as they are arrayed in the claim petition.
3. The claim petitioner filed the petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 claiming compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 02.07.2006.
4. The brief averments in the petition filed by the petitioner are as follows:
On 02.07.2006 at about 3.30 p.m. the petitioner and another boarded an auto bearing registration No.AP 26W 9665 at old bus stand centre, Kaligiri village, to go to M.R.O’s office centre and when the auto reached near Syed Mohammed Tiffin Stall, the driver of the auto lost control over the auto due to his rash and negligent driving and thereby, the auto hit an electrical pole located on the western side of the road, resulting in injuries to the petitioner. The 1st respond
Liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation in the first instance and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.
The liability of the Insurance company to pay compensation to the petitioner in the first instance and later recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle, even when the Insurance company ....
Liability of Insurance company to pay compensation despite driver's lack of required endorsement on driving license.
The Insurance company is liable to satisfy the award in favor of the 3rd party at the first instance and later recover the award amount from the owner of the offending vehicle.
Liability of the insurance company to satisfy the award in favor of a third party, even in the case of absence, fake, or invalid license of the driver, and the procedure for the insurance company to ....
Liability of the insurance company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle.
The liability of the Insurance Company to pay compensation to the petitioners in the first instance and later recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle, as per the principle establishe....
The main legal point established is that a person holding a learner's licence is considered 'duly licensed' and the insurance company is liable to pay compensation to the claimants and later recover ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the liability of insurers in cases of negligent driving and the apportionment of compensation in accordance with the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
