ORDER :

This revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 16.02.2022 dismissing the I.A. No.390 of 2021 in O.S. No.88 of 2018 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Guntakal, filed by the defendants 1 to 4 under Order VII Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, to receive the following list of documents.

2. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as they were arrayed in the suit.

3. The plaintiff filed a suit against the defendants for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from making any illegal attacks on the administration over the plaint schedule church or on the plaintiff, who claimed to have been discharging his duties as a God servant (Pastor) of the plaint schedule church. According to the plaintiff, he was appointed as a God servant (pastor) vide letter dated 29.06.2015 issued by the Chairman of Indigenous Churches of India Trust, Hyderabad, by confirming his earlier temporary appointment dated 07.07.2014 in the same capacity, however, the defendants have been interfering with his duties and further on 07.10.2018 also the 1st defendant, with the aid of defendants 2 to 4, once again tried to interfere with the administration and as such, a complaint was also lodged before the police.

4. The 1st defendant filed a written statement in the suit denying the averments in the plaint and stating that the 1st defendant has been serving as a God servant (Pastor) from the 1st week of June 2016 on his transfer from Pulivendula of Kadapa District vide letter dated 23.05.2016 and previously, he used to work as a Pastor in Rock Prayer House, Pulivendula of Kadapa District from 2013 to 2016 and on his transfer to the plaint schedule church, he handed over the charge to church elders-Brother Devadas and Brother Balreddy and subsequently, one Anandarao, who came from Kadiri to Pulivendula. The 1st defendant claimed that since his joining in the plaint schedule church, he has been rendering devotional services, prayers and meetings in the plaint schedule church peacefully without any objection or interruption from the elders or devotees and that at no point of time after the appointment of the 1st defendant, the plaintiff has come to the plaint schedule church. It is further pleaded that the Chairman, who issued confirmation letter dated 04.12.2018 was appointed as a Chairman by the majority of Trustees in its meetings held on 01.03.2018 and that the 1st defendant has been receiving honorarium from the church management since his joining in the plaint schedule church. But suppressing all the facts, the plaintiff filed the suit by fabricating the documents. It is further pleaded that the defendants 2 to 4 have been maintaining day to day ledgers regarding the financial activities and other activities of the church and the accounts also audited by the auditor.

5. Along with the written statement, the 1st defendant filed documents (1) letter dated 16.02.2013 issued by the Indigenous Churches in India Trust, Hyderabad, (2) letter dt. 23.05.2016 transfer from Pulivendula to Guntakal and (3) the confirmation letter dated 04.12.2018.

6. Thereafter at the stage of leading the defendants’ evidence, the present petition was filed to receive the documents filed along with the letters issued by Kadapa Regional Head Office, Hebeeron Church (Bee