Back
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
Yarraguntla Balachandrudu – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Forest Officer, Nandyal, Kurnool District – Respondent
ORDER :
Heard Sri P. Nagendra Reddy, Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri D. Khasim Saheb, Learned Government Pleader for Forest appearing for the Respondents.
2. The relief sought for by the Writ Petitioner is as under:
Once a vehicle is proved to be used in the commission of a forest offence, the onus of proof shifts to the owner to prove lack of knowledge or connivance, and strict compliance with the A.P. Forest A....
Administrative property seizure is a temporary measure pending criminal conviction. Excessive, unexplained delay in investigation violates the constitutional right to a speedy trial, justifying the q....
The court affirmed that a vehicle seized for forest offences cannot be released until all proceedings are concluded, reinforcing compliance with the Indian Forest Act.
The legality of the seizure of the vehicle under the Kerala Forest Act and the requirement of simultaneous seizure of contraband articles were the central legal points established in the judgment.
Point of Law : 19. Vehicle seized for committing forest offence was not normally to be released to party till culmination of all proceedings in respect of forest offence as particular approach in mat....
Confiscation under the Orissa Forest Act requires proof of a forest offence and adherence to procedural safeguards, failure of which invalidates the confiscation order.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
