SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
Pelala Venkata Subbaiah – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : SODUM ANVESHA
For the Respondent: GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV

ORDER :

As the issues raised in these three writ petitions are common and the facts relating to these writ petitions are similar, they are being disposed of by way of this common order.

2. The petitioners, who are owners of buildings, in Shroff Bazar, in Kurnool Municipal Corporation, have approached this Court being aggrieved by the 2nd respondent- Corporation seeking to seal and demolish their buildings.

3. In W.P. No. 13815 of 2021, the petitioner, in October 2020, received notices from the 2nd respondent- Corporation, under Section 429 of the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 (for short “The Act”), requiring the Petitioner to submit a copy of a sanctioned building plan/BRS/BPS. The writ petitioner submitted a copy of the sanctioned plan, relating to his building, situated in D.No.18/100 A3, Sharoof Bazar, Kurnool. The 2nd respondent had thereupon issued a notice bearing U.C.No.13/2020/WRPS-100 dated 23.11.2020, under Section 452 and 461(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 to the petitioner, directing the petitioner to remove the unauthorized and illegal constructions made in deviation to the approved plan. The respondent-corporation issued subsequ

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top