IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
A.V. SESHA SAI, G. RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, JJ.
Palem Teja Sree – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
W.P. No. 13299 of 2022
Decided On : 04-08-2022
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Vacancy - Denying seat to petitioner - Challenging action of respondent No.2 in denying seat to petitioner in vacancy in respondent No.3-College, vide letter Writ Petition has been instituted – Held, One seat of M.D. Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL) is lying vacant in respondent No.3-college - Having arbitrarily and in contravention of orders of this Court, shifted seats to Mop Up round, respondent No.2 is not justified in taking shelter on ground that seats were transferred to Mop Up round - Since candidates above petitioner did not express consent to join in subject seat, respondent No.2 should have offered same to petitioner - Admittedly, seat which Court directed to be kept vacant, is lying vacant and due to mode and manner adopted by respondent No.2, this situation, obviously, has cropped up and if it is kept vacant, it is beneficial to none - Respondent No.2 is directed to allot a seat in M.D. Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL) in respondent No.3-College to petitioner - Writ Petition is allowed.
ORDER :
A.V.Sesha Sai, J.
Challenging the action of respondent No.2-Dr. N.T.R.University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, in denying the seat to the petitioner in M.D.Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL) in the vacancy in respondent No.3-College, vide letter No.1236/EA2/PG/2021 dated 30.04.2022, the present Writ Petition has been instituted.
2. The petitioner herein appeared for PG-NEET Examination, 2021, and secured All India rank of 64571 and State rank of 4701. She got a seat in M.S. (Obstetrics and Gynecology) in Sri ASRAMS College, Eluru, and respondent No.2-University issued a provisional allotment order dated 24.02.2022. ASRAM College issued a provisional admission order dated 26.02.2022.
3. It is the further case of the petitioner that in the aforesaid Phase-I Counselling under Management Quota (S2), four meritorious candidates secured seats in Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy (DVL) stream in respondent Nos.3 to 5-Colleges and Gayatri Vidya Parishad, Visakhapatnam. Since the said individuals secured the seats in other States and Deemed Universities, the said seats remained vacant, as such, notification for Phase-II Counselling from 16.04.2022 to 18.04.2022 came to be issued. According to the petitioner, she applied in Phase-II. It is further stated that on 21.04.2022 evening, All India Quota and All India Deemed Universities Mop Up round results and Phase-II Management Quota of respondent No.2-University were announced. It is also stated that the two candidates, viz., Mool Chand Suthar and Dantham Gayathri, have secured the seats in NRI Quota in All India Deemed Universities as well as in 2nd respondent-University and College of 3rd respondent. In the above background, earlier, the petitioner herein filed W.P.No.11706 of 2022, seeking the following relief:-
4. This Court, by way of order dated 25.04.2022, disposed of the said Writ Petition No.11706 of 2022 and the operative portion of the said order at paragraph Nos.5 to 7 reads as follows:
6. Sri B. Vijaya Kumar, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent, on instructions states that in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Apex Court in W.P. (Civil) No.174 of 2022, wherein, it was ordered that students who have joined in round 2 of the State quota or round 2 of the All India Quota, shall not be eligible to participate in the Mop-up round for All India Quota. But, the situation herein is something different. Here, the second round of counselling is not yet over. Hence, we feel that if the petitioner is otherwise entitled to in the two vacancies which arose, due to two students opting seats in All India Quota and if the petitioner fulfils all the requirements, the second respondent may deal her application in accordance with law.
7. Having regard to the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no or
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
No legal right vested in the petitioner for allocation of vacant seat, as admission processes are bound by established counseling protocols, reflecting the principle of no fault leading to no prejudi....
A candidate’s vested right to admission once granted cannot be arbitrarily revoked without due process; the State must establish a transparent selection method.
Higher merit cannot override established horizontal reservation rules; allotment must strictly adhere to statutory frameworks.
Technical glitches in online portals cannot justify leaving seats vacant, and courts can direct special measures to fill such vacancies.
Merit-based admission processes cannot be bypassed for individual applicants, protecting the rights of all candidates involved.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgments to determine the correct categorization of candidates in UG Counselling for MBBS / BDS seats....
Candidates selected under the SC category, if eligible for the UR category, should be considered only under the UR category.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.