Back
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
Ganta Satvika Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
Abhinand Kumar Shavili, J.
Both the Writ Petitions are disposed of by this Common Order since the issue involved in both these Writ Petitions is one and the same.
2. Heard Sri Dharmesh D.K. Jaiswal, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Special Government Pleader for Medical and Health, appearing for the respondent No.1, Sri D. Srinivas Prasad, learned counsel for respondent No.3, Sri Ramesh, learned counsel for the 6th respondent and Smt. Gorantla Poojitha, learned Standing counsel for the National Medical Commission, appearing for the respondent No.8.
3. For the sake of convenience, the facts in W.P. No.23420 of 2022 are here under discussed.
4. It has been contended by the petitioner that she has completed her M.B.B.S course and she has appeared for the National Eligibility and Entrance Test (NEET)-PG and secured decent rank i.e., 25948 in the said entrance examination. The petitioner has further submitted that she is interested in pursuing M.D. DVL course and accordingly participated in second phase of counselling and got admission in M.D. DVL course under Management Quota where the fee prescribed is Rs.69 lakhs per annum and the petitioner had an opportunity to partic
The court emphasized the application of Rule 12 (8) (ka) of the M.P. Medical Education (Admission) Rules, 2018, which governs the inclusion of vacant seats in subsequent rounds of counselling.
Vacancy is created either because of non-allocation of seat or candidate not taking admission on allocated seat.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of merit and fair procedure in completing admissions to medical courses, and the entitlement of a wrongfully denied student to compe....
Provisional admissions in medical colleges must adhere strictly to established counseling protocols to safeguard merit in the admission process.
No legal right vested in the petitioner for allocation of vacant seat, as admission processes are bound by established counseling protocols, reflecting the principle of no fault leading to no prejudi....
The central legal point established is that the terms of the Prospectus, including the surrender of occupied PG seats for Mop Up round participation, must be honored for State Quota admissions.
Candidates not domiciled in Uttar Pradesh must meet higher cut-off marks for Unreserved/Open category to qualify for counselling, regardless of their reservation status in their home state.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
