IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, C.J., R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
G. Chittibabu S/o G. Devasahayam – Petitioner
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 28597 of 2024
Decided On : 10-01-2025
ORDER :
R.Raghunandan Rao, J.
1. Heard Mr. Srinivasa Rao Narra, for the Petitioner, the Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 and Mrs. Tata Venkata Sridevi, the learned Standing Counsel for Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences appearing for respondent No. 3.
2. The petitioner had completed M.B.B.S. degree from Guntur Medical College in the year 2009 and had joined the service of the State and is presently working as Civil Assistant Surgeon, in Medarametla Primary Health Centre, since 01.09.2022. The petitioner, appeared for the NEET-PG examination, conducted on 11.08.2024, and obtained All India Rank 165249. The petitioner sought admission into the P.G. Medical Courses, by claiming reservations available to in-service candidates.
3. The State of Andhra Pradesh, for the purposes of promoting better medical care, in this State, in the public hospitals and institutions, had reserved certain seats for in-service candidates, namely Medical Officers, who are in the service of the State, in P.G. admissions under the A.P. Medical Colleges, (Admission into Post Graduate Medical Courses) Rules, 1997 (herein after referred to “P.G. Rules”). The percentage of reservation had been fixed under G.O.Ms. No. 150, dated 11.12.2021 to 30% of seats in clinical and 50% of seats in non-clinical P.G. Medical Courses for in-service candidates. Thereafter, a committee was constituted to go into the question of the percentage of seats that should be reserved for in-service candidates and the terms and conditions under which such reservation should be granted. On the basis of the recommendations made by this committee, G.O.Ms. No. 85, dated 20.07.2024 was issued, whereby the P.G. Rules were amended.
4. One of the amendments, brought in by G.O.Ms. No. 85 was a stipulation that upper age for such in-service candidates, who would be eligible for reservation, is completion of 50 years as on the date of the NEET examination. This upper age limit, was brought in, for the purpose of complying with Rule-f (b) in the impugned G.O. which stipulated that an in-service candidate would have to serve a minimum period of 10 years after completion of the P.G. Courses. This amendment is challenged in the present writ petition by the petitioner. It is the case of the petitioner that the earlier Rules prescribed a mandatory service period of 6 years, whereas the impugned G.O.Ms. No. 85 enhanced the service period to 10 years. Apart from it, the penalty amount of Rs. 25 lakhs, prescribed as a bond condition was enhanced to Rs.50 lakhs. The same would become payable upon failure of the in-service candidate to serve for the required period. The petitioner also assailed the fixation of age limit on the ground that when there was no age limit prescribed in the earlier rules, the amended Rules now prescribe an upper age limit of 50 years. This challenge has come about, as the petitioner is presently 51 years and the stipulation of the upper age limit of 50 years would effectively exclude the petitioner from being given the benefit of in-service reservation.
5. Sri Srinivasa Rao Narra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that such conditions are arbitrary and without any basis. He would further submit that the said conditions have been brought in, midstream, and change of Rules after the process of examination had been initiated is not permissible.
6. The learned Government Pleader would submit that the committee had recommended enhancement of the minimum period of service from six years to ten years and for enhancement of penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs to Rs. 50 lakhs as a measure of ensuring that people of the State are able to obtain the benefit of the enhanced knowledge and skill of the Medical Officers of the State for a longer period. The learned Government Pleader would also point out that the age of superannuation for Medical Officers is 63 years. The P.G. Medical Course is for a period of three years, thus the upper age limit of 50 years
The court upheld the amendments to the P.G. Rules imposing an upper age limit and extended service period for in-service candidates, ruling them as non-arbitrary and justified.
The Government Resolution dated 26 September 2022 providing for a reservation of 20% for in-service candidates was held to be applicable for the current academic year and in consonance with the broch....
In order to ensure equal opportunities for quality higher education to all students in the successor States, the existing admission quotas in all government or private, aided or unaided, institutions....
Merit must prevail in admission to postgraduate medical courses; state can implement service quotas, but must not dilute merit standards.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that while the Ext.P9 Prospectus violated merit-based admission criteria, the splitting up of in-service quota seats and provision of service weigh....
If prospectus fixes an eligibility criteria which offends Article 14, it cannot be said it will hold good for everyone to participate in same manner as provided under prospectus without amendment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.