JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Sri C. Venkaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration for the respondent No.1 and Sri G. Naresh Kumar, learned counsel, representing Sri M. Manohar Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3, the Eluru Municipal Corporation and its authority.

2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, issuance of notice to respondent No.4 is considered not necessary and is dispensed with.

3. The Writ Petition is being deciding finally with the consent of the learned counsels for the parties.

4. This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for the following relief:-

“It is therefore prayed that the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other writ under Article 226 of constitution of India declaring the confirmation order issued under Sec. 452 (2) and 461 (2) r/w 428, 429 of A. P. Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and under 89 (3) of A. P. M. R. and U. D. A. Act 201