SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 86

A. V. RAVINDRA BABU
Tammisatty Veeraswamy S/o Nagaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY

JUDGMENT :

The un-successful accused in Sessions Case No.244 of 2008, on the file of the Court of Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division, Ongole (for short, ‘the learned Sessions Judge’), insofar as his conviction under Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, ‘the IPC’) is concerned, filed the present Appeal questioning the aforesaid conviction and sentence, dated 08.12.2008, recorded by the learned Sessions Judge in S.C. No.244 of 2008.

2. The parties to this Criminal Appeal will hereinafter be referred to as described before the trial Court, for the sake of convenience.

3. The Sessions Case No.244 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Sessions Judge, Prakasam Division, Ongole arose out of committal order in PRC No.7 of 2008 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Addanki (for short, ‘the learned Magistrate’) pertaining to Crime No.23 of 2007 of Martur Police Station registered for the offences under Section 302, 379 and 201 IPC.

4. The State, represented by Inspector of Police, Inkollu filed charge sheet before the learned Magistrate pertaining to Crime No.23 of 2007 alleging the offences under Sections 364, 302, 379 and 201 IPC. The case of the prosecuti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top