Back
2024 Supreme(AP) 32
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO, J.
Tummala Padmavathy, W/o. T.V. Krishna Rao & Ors. - Petitioners
Versus
Adusumilli Loka Satya Ratna Kumar, S/o. Krishna Mohan Rao & Ors. - Respondents
Appeal Suit No. 621 of 2008
Decided On : 23-01-2024
For the Petitioner: P. Sri Raghu Ram.
For the Respondents: N. Siva Reddys.
Dismissal for default due to insufficient address
Headnote:
Dismissal - Insufficient Address - Appeal dismissed for default
Fact of the Case:
The appellants' counsel addressed a letter to the appellants through Registered Post, but it was returned with an endorsement 'insufficient address' and the appellants were not in touch with him.
Finding of the Court:
The Appeal is dismissed for default with no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in the Appeal shall stand closed.
Issues:
Ratio Decidendi:
Final Decision: The Appeal is dismissed for default with no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending in the Appeal shall stand closed.
JUDGMENT :
1. Learned counsel for the appellants is present and learned counsel for the respondents is also present through virtual hearing.
2. When the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", learned counsel for the appellants represented that he addressed a letter to the appellants through Registered Post, but the same was returned with an endorsement “insufficient address” and he further represented that the appellants are not in touch with him.
3. The same is recorded.
4. Hence, this Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
As sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal shall stand closed.
