Back
VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
Mandala Eswara Rao, S/o. Appalanaidu – Appellant
Versus
Subbavarapu Narasimhamurthy, S/o. Kannamnaidu – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing learned counsel for the respondents is present through virtual hearing. Though the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is not inclined to prosecute the appeal.
2. Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
Non-appearance and lack of inclination to prosecute the appeal can lead to dismissal of the suit.
Non-prosecution of an appeal can lead to its dismissal.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by appearing for the hearing may lead to dismissal of the appeal suit.
Dismissal for non-prosecution due to lack of representation and inclination to prosecute the appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
Non-prosecution leading to dismissal of appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants fail to appear for the hearing and show no inclination to prosecute the appeal.
The court has the discretion to dismiss an appeal for non-prosecution if the appellants do not appear for the hearing.
Failure to prosecute the appeal by not being represented in court can lead to dismissal.
Non-prosecution of an appeal may lead to its dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
