SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 92

V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO
B. Nandikesava Rao, S/o. Sivayya – Appellant
Versus
B. Someswaramma, W/o. Nandikesavarao – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Addepalli Suryanarayana.
For the Respondents: M.S.R. Subrahmanyam.

JUDGMENT :

1. Today, when the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, Sri Addepalli Suryanarayana, learned counsel for the appellants represented that his clients are not in touch with him and necessary orders may be passed. The same is recorded.

2. In view of the above representation, since the appellants are not getting ready to prosecute the appeal, the appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top