TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
T. Satyanarayana Rao S/o T. Kondayya – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking to quash the charge sheet in T.E.C.No.307 of 2013 on the file of the 3rd respondent herein.
2. The charge framed by the Tribunal against the petitioner is that, “while he was working as Prohibition and Excise Inspector, SHO, Peddapuram, East Godavari District from 05.01.2010 to 30.06.2012, the petitioner herein along with other informal liquor groups, actuated by corrupt motive and in connivance with the leaders of S.U.S. and other Liquor Groups, received Mamools and abused official position by omission of lawful duties i.e. allowed belt shops, lose sales and consumption at the wine shops, sales beyond business hours, to sell the liquor over and above MRP rates and also not taken prompt action to control violations of Excise Act/Rules, besides allowing the operation of A4 wine shops in benami names of various liquor groups and running belt shops and thereby caused pecuniary advantage to the leaders of the liquor groups by not taking prompt action as mandated in accordance with law and rules and conditions of the licence under A.P. Excise Act, and thereby, the petitioner is guilty of mis-cond
Anant R. Kulkarni v. Y.P. Education Society and others
Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India and others v. A. Masilamani
Government of Andhra Pradesh and others v. V. Appala Swamy
Government of Tamil Nadu v. K.N.Ramamurthy
K.Swarna Kumari, Subordinate Judge vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and others
P.V. Mahadevan v. M.D.Tamilnadu Housing Board
Secretary, Ministry of Defence v. Prabhash Chandra Mirdha
State of Andhra Pradesh v. N.Radhakrishnan
State of Madhya Pradesh and another v. Akhilesh Jha and another
Union of India through Secretary and others v. Udai Bhan Singh
Delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings must be examined on a case-by-case basis, and prejudice caused by the delay can lead to the quashing of the charge sheet. Inordinate delay in issuing the ....
The delay in disciplinary proceedings must be properly explained by the Department, and in the absence of a valid and acceptable explanation, the charges can be quashed based on the nature of the cas....
Long delays in disciplinary proceedings can lead to their quashing, especially when the charged employee is not at fault, violating principles of administrative justice.
Point of law: suspension was prolonged for more than 11 years in some of the judgments referred above. But, still, the Courts held that, it depends upon the circumstances of each case and varies from....
Excessive delay in disciplinary proceedings, attributable to the inaction of the State, can lead to the quashing of the proceedings, especially when the delay violates the petitioner's right to a spe....
Unexplained delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings and vague charges can lead to quashing of the charge sheet, as it would be unfair and cause prejudice to the accused.
Delay in conducting disciplinary proceedings can lead to quashing of the proceedings, even if the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings is not functioning, if the delay is inordinate and causes menta....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.