HARISH TANDON, PRASENJIT BISWAS
State of West Bengal – Appellant
Versus
Snehasis Saha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Prasenjit Biswas, J. :
1. The instant writ petition has arisen out of an order passed by the West Bengal Administrative Tribunal on 16.09.2018 in connection with O.A. 266 of 2014 wherein the respondent had prayed for quashing the disciplinary proceeding as well as charge sheet issued against him.
2. By the impugned order the learned Tribunal allowed the original application filed by the respondent by quashing the memorandum of charges on the ground that there has been inordinate delay in issuing the memorandum of charges for which no explanation was offered.
3. Shorn of details, the respondent herein was appointed to the post of Assistant Engineer with effect from 03.11.1995 at PWD Department and on the selfsame date he was sent to the Housing Department, Government of West Bengal on deputation and was posted as Assistant Director, Akra Subdivision under Akra Division of brick production holding additional charge of Akra Subdivision II. Thereafter, this respondent was transferred from his the then post to the post of Assistant Engineer, Plessey Subdivision by an order dated 24.11.1999. He got higher scale of pay under the West Bengal services ROPA Rules 1998 on 28.05.2007 an
M.V. Bijlani vs. Union of India & Ors.
P.V. Mahadevan vs. M.D. Tamil Nadu Housing Board reported in AIR 2006 SC 207
State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Bani Singh & Anr.
State of A.P. Vs N. Radhakishan reported in (1998) 4 SCC 154
Delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings must be examined on a case-by-case basis, and prejudice caused by the delay can lead to the quashing of the charge sheet. Inordinate delay in issuing the ....
Long delays in disciplinary proceedings can lead to their quashing, especially when the charged employee is not at fault, violating principles of administrative justice.
Inordinate delay in disciplinary proceedings does not vitiate them if explained by CBI investigation without proven prejudice to the officer.
Inordinate unexplained delay exceeding 12 years in disciplinary proceedings against retired employee, coupled with procedural lapses, causes serious prejudice and warrants quashing to uphold natural ....
Point of law: suspension was prolonged for more than 11 years in some of the judgments referred above. But, still, the Courts held that, it depends upon the circumstances of each case and varies from....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.