Back
RAVI NATH TILHARI
L. Venkateswarlu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Heard Sri V. Ravi Chandran, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri B. Srinivasarao, learned Asst. Govt. Pleader for Services - I.
2. This writ petition has been filed for the following relief :
Delay in initiating disciplinary proceedings must be examined on a case-by-case basis, and prejudice caused by the delay can lead to the quashing of the charge sheet. Inordinate delay in issuing the ....
Delay alone is not a sufficient ground to quash disciplinary proceedings. Prejudice must be demonstrated, and the gravity of the charges and all relevant factors involved in the case must be consider....
Point of law: suspension was prolonged for more than 11 years in some of the judgments referred above. But, still, the Courts held that, it depends upon the circumstances of each case and varies from....
Point of law: The protracted disciplinary enquiry against a Government employee issued, therefore, be avoided not only in the interests of Government employee, but in the public interest and also in ....
Long delays in disciplinary proceedings can lead to their quashing, especially when the charged employee is not at fault, violating principles of administrative justice.
Merely stating that huge financial losses are caused to the State would not suffice unless the charges are even prima-facie supported by any credible material placed before the court.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
