IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
RAVI NATH TILHARI, B.V. L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI, JJ.
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Department of Environment, Forest, Science & Technology, Rep.by its Principal Secretary and Others - Petitioners
Versus
Sri P. Maruthi Prasada Rao and Others - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 29304 Of 2022
Decided On : 22-12-2023
JUDGMENT :
(Ravi Nath Tilhari, J.)
Heard Sri Subrahmanyam Sriram, learned Advocate General, assisted by Sri G. V. S. Kishore Kumar, leaned Government Pleader for Services-I and Sri B. Adinarayana Rao, learned senior counsel, assisted by Sri A. Rajendrababu, learned counsel for the 1st respondent. No representation for the 2nd respondent-Union of India, so also 4th respondent- B. Vijay Kumar.
2. The petitioners-State of Andhra Pradesh and its authorities have filed this writ petition challenging the Order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (in short ‘the Tribunal’) for the following relief:
3. The 1st respondent/Applicant before the Tribunal filed O.A.No.020/00628/2021 before the Central Administrative Tribunal for considering him for promotion to the cadre of Indian Forest Service (IFS) from the category of Forest Range Officer (FRO).
4. The case of the 1st respondent was that he was directly recruited as Forest Range Officer in May 2006 and was thereafter promoted as Assistant Conservator of Forests (ACF) in August 2020. His next promotional post is Deputy Conservator of Forests (DCF). The grievance raised was that the respondents in O.A, the petitioners herein, were not considering the 1st respondent's claim for promotion to Indian Forest Service, though the rules and regulations provide for consideration of appointment of Forest Range Officer's cadre Officers to Indian Forest Service on promotion, and the 1st respondent was eligible for such consideration, and thereby, the denial of such consideration was violative of the fundamental right under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
5. The present petitioners filed reply in O.A. The Union Public Service Commission and the Union of India also filed reply. Their stand inter alia was that the service records of the Officers of the State Forest Service (SFS) are maintained by the State Government and the eligibility of State Forest Service Officers comes under the purview of the State Government. Their further stand was that the post of Forest Range Officer was declared as gazetted post, but Forest Range Officer cannot be automatically considered for promotion to Indian Forest Service, and only the Officers belonging to the cadre of Assistant Conservator of Forests/Deputy Conservator of Forests are to be included in the zone of consideration as per seniority. Their stand was that though the Forest Range Officer belongs to the gazetted category, but cannot be considered for appointment by promotion to Indian Forest Service. As per Andhra Pradesh Public Employment Order, dated 1975, the Forest Range Officer is a local cadre post in each zone, whereas Assistant Conservator of Forests is a State Cadre post. Their further stand was that as per G.O.Ms.Nos.154 and 159, dated 18.11.1997/08.12.2008 there are separate entrance and training rules for State Forest Service and Forest Range Officers. The Forest Range Officers do not belong to the State Forest Service so as to be considered for Indian Forest Service. In the absence of adequate number of Officers, the vacancies have to be carried forward to the next panel. It was further their stand that the selection for the panel year 2013 was under process and the contingency of number of Assistant Conservator of Forest/Deputy Conservator of Forest Officers to be considered for Indian Forest Service were not less than the number of posts. The posts of Assistant Conservator of Forest/Deputy Conservator of Forest have been included in State Forest Service, but not Forest Range Officers, as per the Indian Forest Service (Recruitment) Rules of 1966 (in short 'the Recruitment Ru
B. Amrutha Lakshmi v. State of A.P.
Gopal Singh v. State Cadre Forest Officer’s Assn.
Land Acquisition Officer & Mandal Revenue Officer v. V. Narasaiah
Guru Nanak Dev University v. Sanjay Kumar Katwal & Anr.
Forest Range Officers are not part of the State Forest Service under the Indian Forest Service Recruitment Rules due to the absence of required Central Government approval for promotion eligibility.
In service jurisprudence a distinction is made between a "substantive appointment” and an "officiating appointment While substantive appointment confers on the person so appointed a substantive right....
: : (1) It is only Trained Forester who can be promoted from Forest Range Officer Grade-I to Assistant Conservator of Forest because of training he possesses. (2) Cadre management is exclusively prer....
Officers are entitled to Senior Time Scale upon completing four years of service, irrespective of passing departmental exams; their substantive rights are protected.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.