SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1376

T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Shaik Hussain Bee – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
K.Rathangapani Reddy, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Accused, in Sessions Case No.32 of 2015 on the file of the learned IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kurnool [for short, "the trial Court"], is the appellant herein. She was tried for the offence punishable under Sec. 304-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [for short, "I.P.C."].

2. Vide Judgment, dtd. 26/2/2016, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the Accused under Sec. 235(2) of Cr.P.C. Instead of convicting her for the offence under Sec. 304-B I.P.C. the trial Court convicted the accused for the offence under Sec. 306 I.P.C. Accordingly, she was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for Five (5) Years for the offence punishable under Sec. 306 I.P.C.

3. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as arrayed before the trial Court.

4. The facts, as culled out from the evidence of prosecution witnesses, are as under:-

(a) P.W.1-Shaik Sali Bee is the mother of the deceased/Reshma. Reshma was given in marriage to the accused's son, who is deaf and dumb. P.W.1 gave the accused Rs.50,000.00 cash and two tulas of gold towards dowry. Her son-in-law used to look after her daughter well, but the accused used to harass her, directing her to do agricul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top