Back
K. MANMADHA RAO
Mary `s Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
K. Mary Ratnam – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of cases and primary facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. procedural fairness and interim orders (Para 8 , 10) |
| 3. claims of improper election and governing body procedures (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 20) |
| 4. procedural correctness is essential for valid elections in societies. (Para 18) |
| 5. analysis of bye-laws regarding meetings (Para 22 , 24 , 25 , 28 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 36 , 40) |
| 6. bylaws must be strictly adhered to in elections and decision-making processes. (Para 23) |
| 7. ruling in favor of appellant regarding status as secretary (Para 39 , 41) |
| 8. final decision and closure of proceedings (Para 42 , 43) |
JUDGMENT
1. Since the Civil Revision Petitions arise out of a common order dtd. 29/6/2018 passed in SOP No.308 of 2012 and SOP No.51 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram (for short "the Court below"), they are being taken up for disposal together, by way of this common order.
2. SOP No.308 of 2012 was filed by the petitioners in C.R.P.No.4160 of 2018 seeking a declaration that 2nd petitioner is continuing as Secretary and Correspondent of 1st petitioner Society, and to declare the Executive Body Meeting dtd. 23/5
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
