SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1417

K. MANMADHA RAO
Mary `s Educational Society – Appellant
Versus
K. Mary Ratnam – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
P.Roy Reddy, Advocate, C.V.Mohan Reddy, Advocate, K.Venkatesh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. Since the Civil Revision Petitions arise out of a common order dtd. 29/6/2018 passed in SOP No.308 of 2012 and SOP No.51 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Judge, East Godavari at Rajamahendravaram (for short "the Court below"), they are being taken up for disposal together, by way of this common order.

2. SOP No.308 of 2012 was filed by the petitioners in C.R.P.No.4160 of 2018 seeking a declaration that 2nd petitioner is continuing as Secretary and Correspondent of 1st petitioner Society, and to declare the Executive Body Meeting dtd. 23/5/2012 and the election of the respondents as void, and also to grant permanent injunction against the respondents, excluding 6th respondent, not to proclaim that they are Executive Committee members and not to interfere with the day to day affairs of the petitioners and in maintaining bank accounts.

3. SOP No.51 of 2015 was filed by the respondents in C.R.P.No.4163 of 2018 seeking a declaration that K. Raj Kumar is not Secretary and Correspondent of the Society and for directing him to hand over the original property documents of the society and to render accounts from the year 2004 to 27/5/2012 and grant permanent injunctio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top