Back
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Karnati Ramesh Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Ch Sudhakar Reddy – Respondent
JUDGMENT
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J. - This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred under Sec. 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 (in short 'The Act') against the impugned order dtd. 31/7/2010 in W.C. No.13 of 2009 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Ongole (in short, "Commissioner").
2. The appellant herein was the applicant, the respondent Nos.1 & 2 herein were the Opposite Parties before the learned Commissioner. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter will be referred to as they arrayed before the learned Commissioner.
3. Initially, the applicant approached the Commissioner, seeking compensation of Rs.4, 00, 000.00 for the injuries sustained in the accident on 11/8/2008 while he was discharging his duties as driver of the lorry bearing No.AP 16 TU 5666 belonging to O.P. No.1. The learned Commissioner on appreciation of the evidence on record and after hearing both the counsel, dismissed the claim on the point that the applicant has not sustained any permanent disability and thereby any loss in his earning capacity.
4. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order impugned, the applicant carried the
A disability certificate issued by a qualified medical professional suffices to establish loss of earning capacity, and factual findings of a compensation Commissioner are final if admissible evidenc....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for reasoned orders and the consideration of functional disability, particularly in professions with specific physical demands.
The main legal point established is that the calculation of compensation for disability and entitlement to interest under the Workmen's Compensation Act is based on the doctor's evidence of disabilit....
The court emphasized the requirement for assessment of loss of earning capacity by a qualified medical practitioner as provided under Section 4(1)(c)(ii) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
The insurer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act cannot be held liable from the date of the accident if the claim is filed later, with compensation reflecting permanent functional disability assessed....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
