Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
New India Assurance Co. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Mithubhai Bhurabhai Jogi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. understanding the context of injury claims under the workmen's compensation act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. exploring the arguments regarding insurance liability and corporate relationships. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. assessing judicial interpretation on the assessment of permanent disability in injury cases. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Present appeal is filed by the appellant (original opponent No.2) under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act , 1923 (hereinafter be referred to as “the Act”) against the judgment and award dated 24.06.2008 passed by the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner, Labour Court, Kutch at Bhuj in Workman Compensation (Non Fatal) Case No. 29 of 1997 whereby the learned Commissioner has allowed the claim petition and directed the original opponents No.1 and 2 jointly and severally to pay compensation at Rs.2,36,472/- with 9% interest from the date of accident till realization and further directed insurance company to pay penalty at the rate of 50% of the awarded amount.
3. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and award, the appellant – insurance company has preferred this appeal.
5. Mr.Thakkar, learned counsel for the appellan
The insurer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act cannot be held liable from the date of the accident if the claim is filed later, with compensation reflecting permanent functional disability assessed....
Injury in course of employment – Taking type of disability into concern, just compensation should to awarded to person aggrieved – “Just Compensation” should include all elements that would go to pla....
The court determined that total disablement under the Workmen's Compensation Act is established when injuries completely incapacitate a claimant from performing their previous job, warranting maximum....
The assessment of disability in compensation cases must rely on credible medical evidence, and arbitrary increases in disability percentages are not permissible.
The court emphasized the requirement for assessment of loss of earning capacity by a qualified medical practitioner as provided under Section 4(1)(c)(ii) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.
Functional incapacity determines total disablement, overriding medical assessments if it incapacitates work ability.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
