BANDARU SYAMSUNDER
S. Chinna Narayana – Appellant
Versus
R. Anjaneyulu – Respondent
JUDGMENT
BANDARU SYAMSUNDER, J. - As both Motor Accident Civil Miscellaneous Appeals arising out of same Award passed by the Tribunal can be disposed of by a Common Judgment.
2. The MACMA No.2217 of 2016 is filed by the appellant/petitioner/claimant, whereas MACMA No.493 of 2017 is filed by the appellant/2nd respondent/Insurance Company, under Sec. 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (herein after referred to as "M.V.Act"), challenging the Award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-Principal District Judge, Kadapa in MVOP No.533 of 2015, dtd. 7/4/2016, wherein and whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs.7, 66, 000.00 to the claimant with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till the date of deposit into the Court, against his claim a sum of Rs.20, 00, 000.00
3. The appellant in MACMA No.2217 of 2016, and the appellant in MACMA No.493 of 2017 herein after referred to as petitioner and 2nd respondent/Insurance Company as arrayed before the Tribunal for the sake of brevity and convenience.
4. The petitioner has filed the petition under Sec. 166 of the M.V.Act read with Rule 475 of AP Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 claiming compensation of Rs.20, 00, 000.
Arvind Kumar Mishra v New India Assurance Company Limited
B Kothandapani v Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Limited
Govind Yadav v New India Insurance Company Limited
H. West and Son Ltd. v. Shephard
M/s Concord of India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nirmala Devi and others
Mohan Soni vs. Ram Avtar Tomar And Others
R.D. Hattangadi v. Pest Control (India) Pvt. Ltd
Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar and Ors. (2011)1 SCC 343
Ramesh Chandra v Randhir Singh
Oriental Insurance Company Limited vs. Soundarya and others. 2019 ACJ 2340
R D Hattangadi v Pest Control (India) (Pvt) Ltd.(1995) 1 SCC 551
National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Pranay Sethi and others case
Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences v Prasanth S Dhananka
Smt.Sarla Verma and others, Appellants Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & another, Respondents
The delay in lodging the FIR does not invalidate a claim for compensation. The compensation awarded should cover pain, suffering, loss of income, medical expenses, loss of amenities, and loss of futu....
In accident claims, the standard of proof is the preponderance of probabilities. Delay in reporting an accident is not fatal if adequately explained by the claimant's medical condition, and the non-a....
Compensation for injuries must reflect a fair assessment of pain, suffering, and loss of income, even exceeding claimed amounts if justified by evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.