SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(AP) 171

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
B. Nagalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rayaprolu Srikanth, Advocate, K.B.Ramanna Dora, Advocate, K.Lakshmana Raju, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondent Nos., 1 to 4 in not considering the application of petitioner dtd. 29/1/2015 and the representation dtd. 18/4/2018 and consequently, seeking to direct the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the petitioner for appointment in a suitable post in the State Bank of India on compassionate grounds, without insisting the signature of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in Annexure-II as dependents to the deceased.

2. The case of the Petitioner in brief is as follows:

2.1. One B.N.K.Krishna Kishore, who joined in the service as Assistant Manager in Respondent Bank, Kakinada, on 20/8/2007, died on 29/10/2014, leaving behind the Petitioner/his wife, minor son, aged about six years, besides his parents/Respondent Nos.5 and 6. It is the Petitioner's case that, during the life time of her husband, his parents used to harass her and she has no cordial relations with Respondent Nos., 5 and 6.

2.2. On 29/1/2015, Petitioner has applied to Respondent Nos.1 to 4 seeking a suitable job to her on compassionate grounds. Respondent No.5

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top