IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.
B.Nagalakshmi - Appellant
Versus
Branch Manager - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 33258 of 2018
Decided On : 02-01-2024
Compassionate Employment - Employment on Compassionate Grounds - State Bank of India - Article 226 - State Bank of India Act, 1955 - Rules of the State Bank of India - State Bank of India Officers Service Rules, 1992 - State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Rules, 1955 - State Bank of India Employees' Gratuity Fund Rules, 1972 - State Bank of India Employees' Pension Fund Regulations, 2014
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, wife of a deceased State Bank of India employee, sought compassionate appointment after her husband's death. She faced difficulties in obtaining the required signatures from her in-laws for the application, leading to the bank's refusal to consider her case.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged the purpose of compassionate employment to provide immediate financial support to the deceased employee's family. It emphasized that compassionate employment is not a source of recruitment or a vested right, and the financial condition of the deceased family at the time of death should be the primary consideration. The court also highlighted the need for expeditious consideration of compassionate appointment applications to prevent undue delay and financial hardship.
Issues: The main issue was whether the court could direct the bank to consider the petitioner for compassionate appointment without the submission of Annexure-II, given the petitioner's inability to obtain the required signatures from her in-laws.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that while compassionate appointment is not a matter of right, the financial condition of the deceased family at the time of death should be the primary consideration. It emphasized the need for expeditious consideration of compassionate appointment applications to prevent undue delay and financial hardship. The court also highlighted that the appointment on compassionate grounds is an exception to the general rule and must adhere to the stipulations made in the policy.
Final Decision: The court directed the Respondent-Bank to consider the application of the petitioner for compassionate appointment without insisting for Annexure-II, treating it as an exceptional case, as expeditiously as possible within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the court's order.
JUDGMENT
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction in the nature of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondent Nos., 1 to 4 in not considering the application of petitioner dtd. 29/1/2015 and the representation dtd. 18/4/2018 and consequently, seeking to direct the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to consider the petitioner for appointment in a suitable post in the State Bank of India on compassionate grounds, without insisting the signature of Respondent Nos.5 and 6 in Annexure-II as dependents to the deceased.
2. The case of the Petitioner in brief is as follows:
2.1. One B.N.K.Krishna Kishore, who joined in the service as Assistant Manager in Respondent Bank, Kakinada, on 20/8/2007, died on 29/10/2014, leaving behind the Petitioner/his wife, minor son, aged about six years, besides his parents/Respondent Nos.5 and 6. It is the Petitioner's case that, during the life time of her husband, his parents used to harass her and she has no cordial relations with Respondent Nos., 5 and 6.
2.2. On 29/1/2015, Petitioner has applied to Respondent Nos.1 to 4 seeking a suitable job to her on compassionate grounds. Respondent No.5 got issued a legal notice dtd. 2/12/2014 to Respondent Nos.1 and 2 as well as to the petitioner stating that the petitioner is not entitled to withdraw all the retirement benefits. Petitioner also issued a legal notice on 10/4/2015 to Respondent Nos.1 and 2, in the process of her application for compassionate appointment.
2.3. A series of litigation followed right from claims before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum to the civil court and Petitioner as well as Respondent No.5 received their respective shares out of the retirement benefits of the deceased.
2.4. Alongwith her application for compassionate appointment, Petitioner annexed an undertaking, vide Annexure -III dtd. 2/5/2017 to maintain the dependents of the deceased i.e., her son and her parents-in-law. Thereafter, she received a letter dtd. 30/11/2017 from Respondent No.1 asking her to furnish Annexure-II, which must be signed by all the dependents.
2.5. It is the Petitioner's case that Respondent Nos., 5 and 6 are not inclined to sign the Annexure-II owing to their pre-existing matrimonial disputes. It is stated that she alone is eligible legal representative to get appointment on compassionate grounds.It is averred that Respondent Nos.5 and 6 have certain ancestral properties, while she with her minor son are living at their mercy. It is also placed that Petitioner by a representation dtd. 8/4/2020 to Respondent Nos.1 to 4, stated that after getting appointment on compassionate grounds, would pay a part of her salary to the Respondent Nos.5 and 6.
2.6. Petitioner contends that the format of Annexure-II demanding her to get signatures from her in-laws, with whom she has no cordial relations, compromises on her dignity. It is also stated that non-consideration of her representation is illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
3. Version of the Respondents in Counters
3.1. A counter Affidavit is filed by Respondent Nos.1 to 4 with the following averment at para 3 extracted hereunder;
"3. It is submitted that as per the New Policy of the State Bank of India, the Bank is not entertaining any appointments on compassionate grounds as matter of policy, but, if any person otherwise eligible and needy, we are providing some ex-gratia and not employment. However, as per our Circular instructions, in exceptional following cases, we are providing appointment on compassionate grounds:
i) Employee dying while performing is official duty, as a result of violence, terrorism, robbery or dacoity.
ii) Employee dying within five years of his first appointment or before reaching the aged of 30 years, whichever is later, leaving a dependant spouse and/or minor children."
3.2. Further, it is also stated that a person claiming employment under compassionate grounds, is
Canara Bank v. M. Mahesh Kumar
Mumtaz Yunus Mulani v. State of Maharashtra
N.C. Santhosh v. State of Karnataka and Others
Punjab National Bank v. Ashwini Kumar Taneja
State of H.P. V. Shashi Kumar [(2019) 3 SCC 653 : (2019) 1 SCC (L&S) 542
Smt.Sushma Gosain and Others V. Union of India and Others
State of H.P. v. Parkash Chand
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of a compassionate appointment request must be based on valid and reasoned grounds, considering the financial distress of the pe....
Point of law: compassionate appointment could not be denied on the ground that family benefit scheme was available, in as much as it was not a substitute for compassionate appointment, directed the r....
Compassionate appointment is a benevolent scheme aimed at providing immediate financial relief to the family of a deceased government employee, and the requirement of being a 'local candidate' should....
Point of law: In the case of appointment considering the social and economic justice as enshrined in the constitution, denials of deserving cases are liable to be set aside. Further, the purpose of p....
FAMILY PENSION - Grant of family pension or payment of terminal benefits cannot be treated as a substitute for providing employment assistance. The High Court also observed that it is not the case of....
Compassionate appointment is an exception and a concession, not a right, and should be made strictly in accordance with the rules. Long delays can lead to the rejection of compassionate appointments.
Compassionate appointment applications must be submitted within one year of the employee's death, with strict adherence to guidelines to ensure timely relief for families in financial distress.
Compassionate appointments should consider actual hardships faced by dependants rather than strict adherence to procedural timelines, promoting social justice and support for indigent families.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.