SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(AP) 1310

NINALA JAYASURYA
Vanacharla Venkata Krishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Sita Ram Chaparla, Advocate, N.Harinath, Advocate, S.S.Varma, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the Notification dtd. 18/4/2018 in SO No.1701/E) issued by respondent Nos.1 & 2 under Sec. 3(A)(1) of National Highways Act, 1956; further Notification dtd. 7/12/2018 in SO No.6078(E) issued under Sec. 3D(1) of same statute; further Notification dtd. 18/1/2019 issued under Sec. 3G(3) of the same statute by the 5th respondent; further Notification dtd. 11/10/2022 in NHAI/PIU-RJY/LA/N.H216A/Kaikaram Flyover under Sec. 3G(3) of the same statute by the 5th respondent and also Order dtd. 18/6/2018 in ROC NHAI-16/Flyover/2018/1 passed by the 5th respondent, as being illegal, irregular, irrational, unconstitutional and violative of provisions of National Highways Act, 1956 and offends Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India.

2. Heard Mr.Sita Ram Chaparla, Learned Counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr.S.S.Varma, Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.3 & 4 and the Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition representing for respondent No.5.

3. The relevant facts germane for consideration and the disposal of the Writ Petition may be stated thus:- The 1st respondent issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top