SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Palem Ram Suresh – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content so I can analyze it and generate the key points accordingly.
ORDER
Subba Reddy Satti, J. - Challenging the notice dated 22.05.2021 issued by 4th respondent under Section 68 and 164 of Electricity Act, 2003 r/w Telegraph Act,1885 and CEA (Safety and Electricity Supply) Guidelines, 2010, the above writ petition was filed.
2. a) Averments in the affidavit, in brief, are that the petitioners owned land in S.No.393 apart from other properties of Rajampet village. Banana, Mango, Lemon etc. crops are being cultivated. Abutting the petitioners' land, 132 KV sub-station was constructed in the year 1990. The land of the petitioners is fit for house sites. The 4th respondent issued notices impugned in the writ petition. A perusal of the notice would disclose that A.P TRANSCO is executing 132 KV D.C/S.C. line from 200 KV sub-station, Rajampet to 132 KV sub-station C.Orampadu under a system improvement scheme for improving the reliability of power supply; that the transmission lines are passing through the lands of the petitioners; that compensation for the land in which the tower laid will be arranged, for tower base area as a part of land diminution and as per the land rates fixed by the District Collector etc.,
b) Petitioners came to know that the respon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.