K. SREENIVASA REDDY
Siddireddy Padmavathi – Appellant
Versus
Dwarampudi Tirapayya Jaganmohan Reddy – Respondent
ORDER
K. Sreenivasa Reddy, J. - The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the order dated 19.12.2022 passed in IA No.927 of 2022 in OS No.110 of 2021 by the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada.
2. The respondent herein/plaintiff filed OS No.110 of 2021 on the file of the learned Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada against the petitioner herein for recovery of money due under a promissory note. Pending the said suit, the petitioner herein/defendant filed IA No.927 of 2022, under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act and under Order XXVI Rule 10A and Section 151 CPC, with a prayer to send the suit promissory note dated 09.09.2019, said to have been executed by the petitioner herein, to India Security Press, Nasik Road, Maharashtra, to know the year of manufacturing of the stamp affixed on the promissory note.
3. The petitioner herein in her affidavit filed in support of the petition stated that she never executed the alleged promissory note in the year 2019 and even in the cross-examination her counsel made a suggestion that the stamp affixed on the alleged promissory note is of the year 2021, but not of the year 2019. She further stated that she had no pe
Ajit Savant Majagvai v. State of Karnataka
Lalit Popli v. Canara Bank & Ors. 2003 (3) SCC 583
Murari Lal v. State of Madhya Pradesh
O. Bharathan vs. K. Sudhakaran
The main legal point established in the judgment is the application of Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act and the relevance of sending the suit promissory note to the Government of India Security ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that when a government expert has already stated that it is not possible to ascertain the age of the ink, and the party seeking expert opinion can ....
The discretion of the court to seek expert opinion on disputed signatures is upheld, regardless of time gaps between signatures on different documents.
The court has the discretion to seek expert opinion on the comparison of disputed and admitted signatures under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and there is no fixed time limit for filin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.