Back
B SYAMSUNDER
Yarragundia Sowmya Sri – Appellant
Versus
Gurijala Venkata Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
B Syamsunder, J.
I have heard learned counsel for petitioner Mr.Haranadha Raju Katta, as well as, learned counsel Mr.Y.Ramesh, representing on behalf of Mr.Madhava Rao Nalluri, learned counsel for respondent.
2. This petition is filed by the petitioner under Section 24 of Code of Civil Procedure (in short, ‘CPC’) seeking transfer of O.S. No.69 of 2021 pending on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole of Prakasam District, to Senior Civil Judge Court, Sattenapalli of Guntur District, on the ground that now she is residing in her parents house at Sattenapalli Town of Guntur Judicial District.
3. The petitioner submits that respondent filed O.S. No.69 of 2021 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, Ongole of Prakasam District, basing on forged promissory note on the ground that it has been executed by her mother-in-law on 17.01.2019 by borrowing Rs.15,00,000/- (rupees fifteen lakhs) from the respondent. It is also the contention of the petitioner that she is the only legal heir of her mother-in-law by name Smt.G.Devi, who died on 21.05.2021, due to covid-19 and her father-in-law and her husband were also died during covid-19 pandemic period. The main contention of t
The court reaffirmed that transfer of cases under Section 24 of CPC requires compelling reasons, especially when trials are at an advanced stage.
Court do not think mere temporary stay for some reasons cannot be the foundation for transferring matters pending before the competent jurisdiction filed by the petitioner, who is a permanent residen....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
