Sheik Jamal Basha vs State Of A P - 2024 Supreme(AP) 1001

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(AP) 1001

VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Sheik Jamal Basha – Appellant
Versus
State Of A P – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Satheesh Kumar Eerla
For the Respondent: Prudvi Raju Mudunuri, Public Prosecutor

ORDER :

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa, J.

The instant petition under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973[for short ‘Cr.P.C’] has been filed by the Petitioners/Respondents/ Accused Nos.1 to 8, seeking quashment of the Order dated 10.03.2021 passed in Criminal Revision Petition No.10 of 2018 on the file of the Court of VII Additional Sessions Judge, Gudur, SPSR Nellore District.

2. The facts that led to filing of the present petition, in brief, are as follows:

a. Respondent No.2 herein filed a private complaint before the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Sullurpet in C.F.R.No.2445 of 2017 and after recording the sworn statements of L.Ws.1 to 4, learned Magistrate dismissed the private complaint filed by Respondent No.2 vide order dated 06.01.2018 on the ground that no prima facie case is made out against the Petitioners to issue process against them.

b. Being aggrieved by the Order passed by the learned Magistrate, Respondent No.2 preferred Criminal Revision Petition No.10 of 2018 before the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Guduru. The learned Sessions Judge allowed the revision petition vide Order dated 10.03.2021 setting aside the order passed by the l