Back
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
New India Assurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Dasari Chennamma – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal context; death of worker at duty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. issues raised in appeal regarding compensation. (Para 5) |
| 3. substantial questions on authority to award compensation. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. commissioner's authority to fix appropriate compensation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. liability of insurance company on penalty and interest. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. conclusion on appeal and cost bearing. (Para 16 , 17) |
JUDGMENT :
VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J.
1. This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed under Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act against the Order dated 22.11.2007 in W.C. No. 37 of 2005 on the file of the Commissioner for Workmen’s Compensation & Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Anantapur.
2. Appellant herein was Opposite Party No. 2/Insurance Company, Respondents Nos., 1 and 2 were the applicants and Respondent No. 3 was the Opposite Party No. 1/owner of the offending vehicle before the learned Commissioner. For the sake of convenience and understanding, the parties are referred to as they were arrayed before the learned Commissioner.
3. Applicant No. 1 herein is the mother and the Applicant No. 2 herein is the wife of the deceased-Dasari Obulesu. Th
It was for claimant to have opted for claim of compensation either under Workmen’s Compensation Act or under Motor Vehicles Act.
Penalties under the Workmen’s Compensation Act are the responsibility of the insurer, not the Insurance Company; interest awarded at 12% was justified.
The insurance company is liable for compensation and penalty under the Workmen's Compensation Act, with the court's jurisdiction limited to substantial legal questions, not factual re-evaluation.
The appeal court can only intervene on substantial questions of law, preserving the Commissioner’s fact-finding authority while holding the employer liable for compensation penalties, with insurance ....
Liability for penalty under the Workmen's Compensation Act rests on the employer, not the insurance company, and interests awarded are also subject to statutory amendments.
The High Court's jurisdiction under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act is limited to substantial questions of law, and it cannot re-evaluate factual findings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
